Agentic grading for legal writing

Grade the
hundredth memo
like the first.

An assistant that reads for what you read for — issue, rule, authority, structure. It drafts the score and the margin comments. You keep the final say on every grade.

Works with Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, and Brightspace: submissions in, grades back
Law professor
The hundredth, like the first.
A−
Same standard, paper 40Criterion by criterion
Built for legal writing programs CRACIRACBluebookMemo · Brief · Motion
01

Consistent scoring

The same standard on the fortieth paper as the first. Criterion by criterion, no drift by the bottom of the stack.

02

Grade in minutes

A drafted score and margin comments in one pass. You review, adjust, and sign — the whole section in an afternoon.

03

Fluent in law

Reads for issue, rule, authority, and structure — not word count or surface polish. It marks what you actually mark.

Assistance

Choose what the assistant adds.

Grading by hand is the base. Scores and written feedback are two separate things you can switch on, either one, both, or neither, and neither is a step up from the other. You are the pilot in command, and you keep the final say on every grade.

Score and feedback work independently. Turning one on does not turn the other on.

Feedback

Margin comments drafted in your voice, on what it noticed: a missing pincite, a thin CRAC, an unsupported rule. Keep one, edit it, or strike it. Nothing reaches a student until you sign.

Written feedback you can edit. Every word is yours to keep or cut.
The problem

By memo thirty,
everyone is losing.

The professor

Attention fades across a stack. The last papers get a tired read the first ones never needed, and the standard quietly drifts.

The student

Feedback thins out by the bottom of the pile. Two similar memos come back with different grades and no clear reason.

Attorney
From first-year memos to the partner's brief.
What it reads for

It reads for what you read for.

Not word count, not a plagiarism score. The things a legal-writing instructor actually marks.

Structure & analysis

Issue, rule, application, conclusion. Whether the argument is built or just asserted.

CRAC, IRAC, and your own frame

Citations & authority

Whether the rule is cited, the pincite is there, and the authority actually supports the claim.

Bluebook problems, flagged

Genre & format

Memo, brief, or motion. Reads to the conventions of the document the assignment asked for.

Set per assignment
The workflow

One assignment, start to finish.

Every step of the grade lives in one place. Scroll to watch it work, or jump to any step.

lawgrader.ai/c/legal-writing-i
New assignment
Closed Memo — Negligence
Genre: Office memo · Due Oct 14
📄
Start blank
📎
From a document
📚
From template
Dropped negligence-memo-prompt.docx. LawGrader read the prompt and pre-filled the genre, length, and what to grade.
1

Build the assignment

Start blank, from a document, or a template. Drop in your prompt and LawGrader reads it — genre, length, and the issues to grade come pre-filled.

→ Office memo detected
New assignment
Closed Memo — Negligence
Genre: Office memo · Due Oct 14
📄
Start blank
📎
From a document
📚
From template
Dropped negligence-memo-prompt.docx. LawGrader read the prompt and pre-filled the genre, length, and what to grade.
2

Draft the rubric by chat

Describe your standard in plain language. The criteria grid materializes as you talk, weighted the way you'd weight it — adjust any number and it rebalances.

→ 4 criteria, 100 points
Draft the rubric by chat
You
Grade on issue-spotting, CRAC structure, whether the authority actually supports the rule, and Bluebook form.
LawGrader
Done. I turned that into 4 criteria. Adjust any weight and I'll rebalance.
Criterion
Pts
Issue spotting
25
CRAC structure
30
Authority supports rule
30
Bluebook form
15
3

Collect submissions

Upload a folder, pull from Google Drive or OneDrive, or import straight from your LMS. Every file is parsed, de-identified, and lined up — you see exactly who is in and who is missing.

→ 28 of 30 imported
Submissions · 28 of 30 in
● Imported from your LMS · Legal Writing I
RM
Rivera, Maria · memo_final.docx
Parsed
JC
Chen, Jordan · negligence_memo.pdf
Parsed
AP
Patel, Aisha · draft2.docx
Parsed
TW
Wells, Tom · awaiting upload
Pending
4

Grade in the cockpit

The paper, your margin comments, the rubric, and the drafted score in one instrument panel. Every deduction is tied to a criterion and a reason — you review, adjust, and sign.

→ Drafted 88 · B+
Grading · Rivera, Maria
The court in Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. held that duty runs only to the foreseeable plaintiff…
Margin comment · AuthorityRule stated well, but the pincite is missing and this cite supports duty, not causation. Tie it back to the issue.
Drafted score
88
B+ · you have the final say
Issue spotting23/25
CRAC structure27/30
Authority24/30
Bluebook14/15
5

Finalize & release

Curve to your policy, sign the stack, and push grades and report PDFs back to the LMS in one move. The whole section, done in an afternoon.

→ Pushed to the gradebook
Finalize & release
Curve to policy: target median B
Raw+2.0 appliedCap A
28 grades signedReady
Report PDFs generatedReady
Pushed to gradebookSynced
Integrations

Works where your class already lives.

Pull submissions, prompts, and rosters from your LMS. Grade in LawGrader. Push scores and report PDFs back to the gradebook, without leaving the page.

Canvas

Submissions and roster in. Grades and report PDFs back. Sign in with Canvas.

Moodle

Submissions, assignment prompts, and roster in. Grades and feedback back.

Blackboard

Submissions and roster in. Grades and feedback back to the gradebook column.

Brightspace

Dropbox submissions, prompts, and roster in. Grades back to the gradebook.

Any LTI 1.3 platform

Launch LawGrader from any LTI 1.3 platform: single sign-on, roster sync, and grade passback. Tell us your platform and we register it.

No LMS? No problem.

Upload a folder, or import straight from Google Drive, OneDrive, or SharePoint. Students can also submit in the portal.

Try it now

Grade a paragraph right now.

Pick a rubric, paste a passage, and see the criterion-by-criterion feedback your students would get. No account needed.

Your writing

Pick a rubric, paste a passage, and grade it.

Write a short legal analysis of one issue. Scored on CRAC: Conclusion, Rule, Application, and Counterargument.

A short preview. You keep the final say on every real grade.

Feedback

Scores are out of 100, with the reasoning for each criterion.

Your feedback will appear here.
Pricing

For one teacher, or a whole program.

For individual teachers

Standard

$49.99 / month
100 AI-graded submissions a month. Save 15% with annual billing.
  • Free trial: 25 submissions, no credit card
  • Full AI grading: a score per criterion and margin comments
  • Rubric builder and the grading cockpit
  • LMS sync with Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, and Brightspace: submissions in, grades back
Start free trial
For schools and programs

Enterprise

Let's talk
Volume pricing and onboarding for a whole legal-writing program.
  • Everything in Standard
  • Volume submission pricing
  • Shared billing and admin controls
  • Onboarding and priority support

Grade Better.

Try it free at lawgrader.ai

Prefer to talk?